Distribution Logistics Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. (DLI/Company) is a leading Logistics company that provides infrastructure based integrated logistics solutions across the country. It is committed to following the highest levels of standards of business ethics, honesty, integrity, professionalism and ethical behavior while conducting its affairs in a fair and transparent manner. DLI is also committed towards ensuring that its actions are in conformity with the applicable laws and regulations. Therefore, DLI encourages its employees who have concerns about suspected misconduct to come forward and express these concerns without fear of punishment or unfair treatment.

The Company has adopted various policies, which lay down the principles and standards that should govern the actions of the Company and its employees. Any actual or potential violation of the Policies, howsoever insignificant or perceived as such, would be a matter of serious concern for the Company. The role of employees in pointing out such violations of the Policies cannot be undermined. Accordingly, this Whistle Blower Policy (“the Policy”) has been formulated with a view to provide a mechanism for employees of the Company to raise concerns on any violations of legal or regulatory requirements, incorrect or misrepresentation of any financial statements and reports, etc.


The purpose of this mechanism is to eliminate and help to prevent malpractices, any actual or potential violation of the policies of DLI, to investigate and resolve complaints, take appropriate action to safeguard the interests of DLI and to ensure that any person making a complaint (referred to as "a Whistleblower”) is protected, while at the same time discouraging frivolous and insubstantial complaints. The role of the whistle-blower is to point out such violations which are detrimental to the organization’s interest of DLI.


The Whistle Blower policy intends to cover serious concerns that could have grave impact on the performance and reputation of the business of the Company.

The policy neither releases employees from their duty of confidentiality in the course of their work, nor is it a route for taking up a grievance about a personal situation.

  1. “Disciplinary Action” means any action that can be taken on the completion of /during the investigation proceedings including but not limited to a warning, imposition of fine, suspension from official duties or any such action as is deemed to be fit considering the gravity of the matter.
  2. “Employee” means every employee of the Company including ex-employee (whether working in India or abroad).
  3. “Good Faith”: An employee shall be deemed to be communicating in ‘good faith’ if there is a reasonable basis for communication of unethical and improper practices or any other alleged wrongful conduct. Good Faith shall be deemed lacking when the employee does not have personal knowledge on a factual basis for the communication or where the employee knew or reasonably should have known that the communication about the unethical and improper practices or alleged wrongful conduct is malicious, false or frivolous.
  4. “Protected Disclosure” means a concern raised by a written communication made in good faith that discloses or demonstrates information that may evidence unethical or improper activity. Protected Disclosures should be factual and not speculative in nature.
  5. “Subject” means a person or group of persons against or in relation to whom a Protected Disclosure is made or evidence gathered during the course of an investigation under this Policy.
  6. “Vigilance Officer” means the Chairman of the Audit Committee, which reports to the Board of Directors of DLI.
  1. Employees of the Company;
  2. Employees of other agencies deployed for the Company’s activities, whether working from any of the Company’s offices or any other location;
  3. Contractors, vendors, suppliers or agencies (or any of their employees) providing any material or service to the Company;
  4. Customers of the Company;
  5. Any other person having an association with the Company.

The above list is illustrative and not exhaustive.

A person belonging to any of the above-mentioned categories can avail of the channel provided by this Policy for raising an issue covered under this Policy.

The Policy covers malpractices and events which have taken place/ suspected to take place involving:
  1. Abuse of authority;
  2. Breach of contract;
  3. Negligence causing substantial and specific danger to public health and safety;
  4. Manipulation of company data/records;
  5. Financial irregularities, including fraud or suspected fraud or Deficiencies in Internal Control and check or deliberate error in preparations of Financial Statements or Misrepresentation of financial reports;
  6. Any unlawful act whether Criminal/ Civil;
  7. Pilferage of confidential/proprietory information;
  8. Deliberate violation of law/regulation;
  9. Wastage / misappropriation of company funds/assets;
  10. Bribery or corruption;
  11. Sexual Harassment;
  12. Retaliation;
  13. Breach of IT Security and data privacy;
  14. Social Media Misuse;
  15. Breach of Company Policy or failure to implement or comply with any approved Company Policy.
The Policy should not be used in place of the Company grievance procedures or be a route for raising malicious or unfounded allegations against colleagues.


To ensure that this Policy is adhered to, and to assure that the concern will be acted upon seriously, the Company will:

  1. Ensure that the Whistle blower and/or the person processing the Protected Disclosure is not victimized for doing so;
  2. Treat victimization as a serious matter, including initiating disciplinary action on person/(s) indulging in victimization;
  3. Ensure complete confidentiality;
  4. Not attempt to conceal evidence of the Protected Disclosure;
  5. Take disciplinary action, if any one destroys or conceals evidence of the Protected Disclosure made/to be made;
  6. Provide an opportunity of being heard to the persons involved especially to the Subject
  1. If one raises a concern under this Policy, he/she will not be at risk of suffering any form of reprisal or retaliation. Retaliation includes discrimination, reprisal, harassment or vengeance in any manner. Company’s employee will not be at the risk of losing her/ his job or suffer loss in any other manner like transfer, demotion, refusal of promotion, or the like including any direct or indirect use of authority to obstruct the Whistle blower's right to continue to perform his/her duties/functions including making further Protected Disclosure, as a result of reporting under this Policy. The protection is available provided that:
    • The Whistle blower has chosen to identify themselves;
    • The communication/ disclosure is made in good faith;
    • The Whistle blower reasonably believes that information, and any allegations contained in it, are substantially true; and
    • The Whistle blower is not acting for personal gain.

    Anyone who abuses the procedure (for example by maliciously raising a concern knowing it to be untrue) will be subject to disciplinary action, as will anyone who victimizes a colleague by raising a concern through this procedure. If considered appropriate or necessary, suitable legal actions may also be taken against such individuals.

    However, no action will be taken against anyone who makes an allegation in good faith, reasonably believing it to be true, even if the allegation is not subsequently confirmed by the investigation.

  2. The Company will not tolerate the harassment or victimization of anyone raising a genuine concern. As a matter of general deterrence, the Company shall publicly inform employees of the penalty imposed and disciplinary action taken against any person for misconduct arising from retaliation. Any investigation into allegations of potential misconduct will not influence or be influenced by any disciplinary or redundancy procedures already taking place concerning an employee reporting a matter under this policy.
  3. Any other Employee/business associate assisting in the said investigation shall also be protected to the same extent as the Whistle blower.

  • Bring to early attention of the Company any improper practice they become aware of. Although they are not required to provide proof, they must have sufficient cause for concern. Delay in reporting may lead to loss of evidence and also financial loss for the Company.
  • Avoid anonymity when raising a concern.
  • Follow the procedures prescribed in this policy for making a Disclosure.
  • Co-operate with investigating authorities, maintaining full confidentiality.
  • The intent of the policy is to bring genuine and serious issues to the fore and it is not intended for petty Disclosures. Employees are expected to avoid invoking their rights under this Policy to settle personal scores or to give vent to their malicious intentions. Malicious allegations by employees may attract disciplinary action.
  • A whistle blower has the right to protection from retaliation. But this does not extend to immunity for involvement in the matters that are the subject of the allegations and investigation.
  • Maintain confidentiality of the subject matter of the Disclosure and the identity of the persons involved in the alleged malpractice. It may forewarn the Subject and important evidence is likely to be destroyed.
  • Conduct the enquiry in a fair, unbiased manner
  • Ensure complete fact-finding
  • Maintain strict confidentiality, especially of the whistle blower’s identity (if available)
  • Decide on the outcome of the investigation, whether an improper practice has been committed and if so by whom
  • Recommend an appropriate course of action - suggested disciplinary action, including dismissal, and preventive measures
  • Record Committee deliberations and provide interim reports from time to time to the Board of DLI;
  • Prepare final report with recommendations and submit to the Board of Directors in a time bound manner.
  • Subjects have the right to be heard and the Vigilance Officer must give adequate time and opportunity for the subject to communicate his/her say on the matter;
  • Subjects have the right to be informed of the outcome of the investigation and shall be so informed in writing by the Company after the completion of the inquiry/ investigation process;
  • Subjects have no right to ask for or be given information about the identity of the whistle blower, even if it is available.

An employee who knowingly makes false allegations of unethical & improper practices or alleged wrongful conduct shall be subject to disciplinary action, up to and including termination of employment, in accordance with Company rules, policies and procedures. Further this policy may not be used as a defense by an employee against whom an adverse personnel action has been taken independent of any disclosure made by him and for legitimate reasons or cause under Company rules and policies.


For more details, refer to the procedure for reporting & dealing with disclosures given in Annexure A.


All reports and records associated with ‘Disclosures’ are considered confidential information and access will be restricted to the Whistle blower, the Audit Committee, and the Vigilance Officer. ‘Disclosures’ and any resulting investigations, reports or resulting actions will generally not be disclosed to the public except as required by any legal requirements or regulations or by any corporate policy in place at that time.


All Protected Disclosures in writing or documented along with the results of investigation relating thereto shall be retained by the Company for a minimum period of 07 years.


A quarterly status report on the total number of complaints received during the period, with summary of the findings of the Audit Committee and the corrective actions taken will be sent to the Board of the Company.


The Company is entitled to amend, suspend or rescind this policy at any time. Whilst, the Company has made best efforts to define detailed procedures for implementation of this policy, there may be occasions when certain matters are not addressed or there may be ambiguity in the procedures. Such difficulties or ambiguities will be resolved in line with the broad intent of the policy. The Company may also establish further rules and procedures, from time to time, to give effect to the intent of this policy and further the objective of good corporate governance.

Annexure A


1. How should a Disclosure be made and to whom?

Disclosures can be addressed to the Vigilance Officer appointed by the Company. Letters can be sent by hand-delivery, courier or post to:

  • Name – AV Ram Mohan
  • Designation – Chairman of Audit Committee and Director
  • Address – 161, St Mary' Road Mylapore, Chennai ,Tamil Nadu India 600004
  • Email ID - avrammohan@gmail.com

2. Is there any specific format for submitting the Disclosure?

While there is no specific format for submitting a Disclosure, the following details MUST be mentioned:

  • Name, address and contact details of the Whistle blower (including Salary Code, if the Whistle blower is a present employee).
  • Brief description of the malpractice, giving the names of those alleged to have committed or about to commit a malpractice. Specific details such as time and place of occurrence are also important.
  • In case of letters, the disclosure should be sealed in an envelope marked “Whistle Blower” and addressed to the Vigilance Officer.

3. What will happen after the Disclosure is submitted?
  • The Vigilance Officer shall acknowledge receipt of the Disclosure as soon as practical (preferably within 07 days of receipt of a Disclosure), where the Whistle blower has provided his/her contact details.
  • The Vigilance Officer shall examine the allegations to determine whether the allegations (assuming them to be true only for the purpose of this determination) made in the Disclosure constitute a malpractice. If the allegations do not constitute a malpractice, the Vigilance Officer will record this finding with reasons and communicate the same to the Whistle blower.
  • If the allegations constitute a malpractice, the Vigilance Officer will proceed to investigate the Disclosure with the assistance of the Audit Committee where the breach has occurred, as he/she deems necessary or as per the process defined under the relevant Policy. The Vigilance Officer may also, with the approval of the Board of Directors, co-opt other officers of the Company for the investigation. If the alleged malpractice is required by law to be dealt with under any other mechanism, the Vigilance Officer shall refer the Disclosure to the appropriate authority under such mandated mechanism and seek a report on the findings from such authority.
  • Employees who violate this Policy or are found guilty based on the investigation carried out by the Audit Committee are subject to disciplinary / corrective action which may include any of the following:

    • Formal apology;
    • Counseling;
    • Written warning and a copy of it maintained in the employee’s file;
    • Change of work assignment / transfer with or without monetary impact;
    • Suspension or termination of services of the employee found guilty of the offence;
    • In case the violation by the individual amounts to a specific offence under the law, the Company shall initiate appropriate action in accordance with law by making a complaint with the appropriate authority.
  • Subjects will normally be informed of the allegations at the outset of a formal investigation and have opportunities for providing their inputs during the investigation.
  • The investigation may involve study of documents and interviews with various individuals. Any person required to provide documents, access to systems and other information by the Vigilance Officer or Audit Committee for the purpose of such investigation shall do so. Individuals with whom the Vigilance Officer or Audit Committee requests an interview for the purposes of such investigation shall make themselves available for such interview at reasonable times and shall provide the necessary cooperation for such purpose.
  • If the malpractice constitutes a criminal offence, the Vigilance Officer will bring it to the notice of the Board of Directors and take appropriate action including reporting the matter to the police.
  • The Audit Committee shall conduct such investigations in a timely manner and shall submit a written report containing the findings and recommendations to the Vigilance Officer as soon as practically possible and in any case, not later than 90 days from the date of receipt of the Disclosure. The Vigilance Officer may allow additional time for submission of the report based on the circumstances of the case.
  • Whilst it may be difficult for the Vigilance Officer to keep the Whistle blower regularly updated on the progress of the investigations, he/she will keep the Whistle blower informed of the result of the investigations and its recommendations subject to any obligations of confidentiality.
  • The Vigilance Officer shall take decision on the action to be taken on the recommendations of the Audit Committee and keep the Whistle blower informed of the same. Though no timeframe is being specified for such action, the Company will endeavor to act as quickly as possible in cases of proved malpractice.